This post is not about games, but you can say a minute of story on Stopgame.ru. But since I decided to tie a topic and the topic of the topic and the topic. This is followed by a description of not only specific episodes of wars embodied in games, but also a brief certificate of war.
World in conflict/ plans "inconceivable", "dropshot" and a little of my thoughts
A strange thing. In the Games and Cinema, the USSR attacks Europe and the USA for any reason, and more often just for luls. I was already preparing to write about the landing of Soviet paratroopers on the lawn in front of the "White House". But, what was my surprise that when I began to comb the Internet, I found only a plan for the attack of the United Forces of the West on the USSR in July 1945 and the plan for the reflection of America from the USSR (it served as the basis for “World in Conflict”). But after the collapse of the USSR, nothing like that was published. And this is despite the “anti -Stalin hysteria” and the struggle with the “totalitarian heritage of the scoop”. It may even give the impression that there were no such plans, and the propaganda of the USSR did not lie about a peaceful country, but it was hard to believe it. Maybe they are still in use? Who knows. But consider what is.
The plan “inconceivable” – according to it, the USA, England, their allies and the surviving Wehrmacht forces were supposed to attack the USSR on July 1. I won’t paint anything, but I will simply come true to this excellent article, everything is chewed there in detail. And actually the text of the plan.
The next plan is the plan "Dropshot". But this is a plan for the defense of the United States and allies in the event of an attack by the USSR. And again I just attach a link to an analytical article.
The Third World War is an extremely abstract concept. Many believe that with the collapse of the USSR it was lost, or is still going to this day, but in a different form and more resembles a “centenary war” or a “thirty -year war”. And is a focal battle of superpower all over the world, which has been happening for the past 70 years. But this term is already firmly associated with large -scale military operations, tanks on the "Champs Elysees", which glowing Washington, and so on, and it does not matter what the figure will be in the name. Such a war that was the “Second World War” only with nuclear and biological weapons will no longer be, for a number of reasons.
Well, now let’s fantasize a little.
In 1940-1941, the highest command of the USSR developed a plan for a prey blow to Germany July 10-16, 1941. This plan was planned to be put into effect in case of the declaration of war by Hitler Stalin. The plan was good for everyone. Without going into the details of who stepped on whom, the Wehrmacht was quite real by mid -1942. And the Americans would have performed on the side of the USSR. Given the friendship of Stalin and Roosevelt, the world could be divided in half, regardless of England.
Suppose Stalin was a bloodthirsty paranoid and only dreamed of attacking the "Empire of Good" and the naive Hitler.
So without the declaration of war of the USSR, July 10-16, 1941 attacks Germany. The Reich is bad, the defeat is inevitable. But in this case, the whole world will stand up for Germany.
April 17, 1941, the US Congress decided that if the Soviet Union attacks Germany, then the United States will be on the side of Germany. This meant that not only the United States, but also the British Empire, Turkey, Japan would be on the side of Germany, that is, the whole world and the ratio of military potentials would be against the Soviet Union (if we proceed from 100%): 14% of the Soviet Union and 86% against the Soviet Union and 86%.
How can this be, because the United States broke This Is Vegas casino sister sites with the position of neutrality when it began to help England? The war in Europe was only another feudal shower, in order to earn and create perfect conditions for the ruling elite. And Nazism has much in common with English imperialism.
“I’m sure,” the Fuhrer reasoned, “the end of the war will put the beginning of a strong friendship with England. We will live with them in the world. This is the people with whom we can conclude an alliance ".
Words did not disperse with the deed: in June, the forty -first German ambassador to Turkey, Franz von Papen received an order from Berlin: on the first day of the attack on the Soviet Union, discuss with the British ambassador the issue of an alliance against Bolshevism.
“My mission, if I succeed, is to destroy the Slavs,” Fuhrer explained to the Romanian Minister Antonescu. – There should be two races in future Europe: German and Latin. These two races should work in Russia together in order to reduce the number of Slavs. Russia cannot be approached with legal or political formulations, since the Russian issue is much more dangerous than it seems, and we should use colonializing and biological means to destroy the Slavs ”
“There is only one task for us – to carry out Germanization by importing the Germans, and we can do with the indigenous population as with the Indians … We will have to comb the territory, a square kilometer per square kilometer, and constantly hang! It will be a real Indian war. "
From such expressions, it is clear how much in common has Hitler Germany and England.
The Supreme Commissar of England in South Africa Alfred Milner said: “It was the British race that created the empire … Only the British race is able to preserve it,” he also mentioned the “bonds of blood”.
Hitler’s attachment to England, attachment, bordering on worship and expressed, for example, in mockery of India to independence, is not the discovery of the attachment of Hitler. Well -known (at least it was before) that Hitler admired England precisely as a racist.
Even in the classic study of Toynby, there was the fact that “racial prejudices generated by English Protestantism … Unfortunately, they became a determining factor in the formation of racial relations throughout the Western world”.
The following, clearly exaggerated, statement by Liberal of Sir Charles Dilka about the uniqueness of the English practice of genocide: “Anglo -Saxons are the only destroying race on Earth. Never before – up to the beginning of the destruction of the Indians now inevitable … Maori and Australians [Aboriginal] – not a single large race has been erased from the face of the earth by conquerors ".
However, it is impossible not to note the significant differences in the ideology of inspirers and inspired – the difference between a society practicing genocide and the state in which it is part of the official policy. “Nazi Germany was a state that pursued a policy of genocide … (and British) Australia – a society that practiced genocide”. In the English environment (both in the colonies and in England itself), the pressure of society meant much more, and the pressure of the state was much less than in Germany. The extermination of the Australian Aborigines was carried out spontaneously, and not by order of the government. Although Hitler sought to develop the Germans with just such a spontaneous “racial instinct”, Richard Rubinstein quite rightly noted the following difference: “The destruction of the Aborigines … In Australia, it was an unintentional consequence of state policy”, in contrast to the extermination of the victims of Nazism, which was completely intentional and was carried out by order of Hitler. Nevertheless, one cannot help but merit “in merit” to the societies that practiced genocide, that “they promoted Hitler to repetition of this practice, and his state to the systematic implementation of it into life” (obviously not trusting the “racial instincts” of German society).
Thus, the Union of England-Hermania-Ssha was not fantastic.
Hitler arranged a number of structures. Firstly, it was English and American corporations, and secondly, it was German corporations and financiers, and finally, it was a German aristocracy. That is, several groups at once were interested in the fact that someone recreated the empire. In 1930, Herr Mine, financier, persuading other European financiers to support Hitler, said that this person would break national states in Europe, and we will receive Venice the size of Europe. That is, in fact, they wanted to get the European Union. All of them invested money in Hitler. It is these structures that form world capital, from which Hitler broke away and began to play his game.
Churchill wrote: “The unforgivable crime of Germany before the Second World War was her attempt to free his economic power from the world trading system and create her own exchange mechanism that would deprive world finances of profit”
Thus, the United States and England would rally against the USSR on the remnants of the Reich. America would not allow Germany to absorb England.
This is if Churchill and those who over him would have prevailed in the political struggle of England.
IN
From what Churchill himself wrote: “You must understand that this war is not waged against the National Socialism, but against the power of the German people, which should be crushed once and for all, regardless of whose hands it is: in the hands of Hitler or in the hands of a priest-Jesuit”. Please note that not National Socialism is the main opponent of Germany, but Germany. Or in another place even more frankly: “We are not fighting with Hitler,” says Churchill, “but with the German spirit, Schiller’s spirit, so that this spirit is not revived”.
But there were in England the full -fledged alliance with Germany. The Duke of the Kent and the Royal Surname belonged to the Churchill course, to the war and Germany, to put it mildly, Churchill did not love together. Queen and Duke of Kent generally advocated the conclusion of peace with Germany. It was such a very strong anti -Cherillev team. It’s not about Churchill itself, but in those forces – in England and in America, which stood behind him. The fact that the situation of Churchill was very serious in 1941-1942, we know from a very authoritative certificate. In May 1941, the FBI chief Hoover wrote a memorandum to President Roosevelt that a conspiracy against Churchill had ripened in the UK. This conspiracy is headed by the Duke of Windsor.
The USSR would not have a chance to win in such a war.
Here, approximately, this could happen.
Part 1.1 about Cuba
Part 1.2 about Vietnam (corrected the design)
Part 2.1 about Afghanistan
Part 2.2 About Panama
Part 3.1 about the "First War in the Bay"
Part 3.2 About the "Second War in the Gulf"
Part 3.3 about Iran
Part 4 about Afghanistan modern
1. "Left radicalism in Latin America" g.AND. Kolarov
2. "Confession of the economic killer" J. Perkins, for the advice, thanks Windstranger
3. "English roots of German fascism" m. Sargsyanz
3. "Comprehension of history" a. J. Toynby
4. "Clash of civilizations" p. Huntington
5. "Political order in changing societies" with. Huntington
6. “Great transformation. Political and economic sources of our time "to. Polanya
7. "Nemesis. The last days of the American Republic »Ch. Johnson
8. "The uprising of elites and betrayal of democracy" of the Kyrgyz Republic. Lash
I. "The centenary of the war: the Anglo-American oil geopolitics and the new world order"
U. Fr. Endal
10. “The coalition wars of the Anglo -Saxons. History and modernity "with. L. Pechurov
11. "Yugoslav war of 1991-1995" Valetsky about. IN., not quite on the topic, but the book is good
12. "War in Vietnam (1946-1975.) »Davidson f. B.
13. "Commandos: formation, preparation, outstanding operations of special units" d. Miller
Write your opinion, criticize and so on. The next part is tomorrow.